Joseph P. Wood: Baby Bear

Baby Bear,

 

Red flag on pole staked into a grass

 

Wind, I remember, wind in that grass

Wind through the bodies of no one I could

Wind a particular sensation I can not

 

Red flag on pole staked into your grass

 

I possess no direction utterly

What is required your sensei said that

You were small and had round cheeks

 

And I fail, Baby Bear, fail you

How can this fact deny this thing

Brain hands hurt chest hurts deeply so

In your home

City, Baby Bear, have I utterly

 

on a page my body quaking

balloon string you are the hand I am possessed beyond

 

What I mean is

 

 

 

 

Sensei circumstance you will if permits

 

You not my hand of my hand through the board

The red flag wind the more words the less is

You listen, Baby Bear, crocodiles lake wind

Like that one time

That one time

 

And you are

Loved beyond me which is what

Is required, afraid quake body

Baby Bear, dark choosing chose

 

I did not respect the deed

Every single sensation I had

Taught me whole blew these leaves

Baby Bear, I bow before the people in time

Fading never so never so one shard of

I tire take short cuts now

I don’t have to finish

 

Everything today

Last one one last broken red sun wind knot know

Better red tape sun grass last time means know anything more

Grass grew me inside you nothing got better

I chose breaking own my I running chose me wrong run

My head hung low in my palm, Baby Bear, last this

Line grass leaves red verb who knows I you I you love love o

 

Joseph P. Wood is the author of four chapbooks and two books of poetry, which include Fold of the Map (Salmon Poetry) and I & We (CW Books). He splits time between Birmingham, AL, and Tuscaloosa, AL.

 

Of Durations, Of Endurances: Interview with Hillary Gravendyk

Tracks. Health/illness as narrative vs. health/illness as lyric. The sentence in prose poetry. Breathlessness. Four interview prompts for Hillary Gravendyk, inspired by her first collection of poems, Harm (Omnidawn Publishing, 2011), preceded by a poem from the book.

Appetite

I was promised only good things. Basket filled with honey or the equivalent of honey. A thicket of long pines rimming the strayable path. Animals rustling. Had a cloak but left my head bare. Warning left its signature. Whiter horizon, a splinter. Basket of clever birds. Crossed the threshold of every afternoon at once. You were a series of obvious errors. A room close as the inside of a mouth, a basket packed with nettles. Costumed heart. I made a delivery; you were made of appetites. Timberwood, tinder. So I waited in the slick sack of your belly. Flinched when the axe came through. Shed you like a wet coat.

from Harm

1. Tracks (as in “Mended my skin with barbed-wire” or “rural route across the cheek”)

This isn’t a term that I had particularly in mind when writing the book so it is interesting that you pulled it out of the poems–the one thing I’ll say is that during the process of waiting, having, and recovering from a lung transplant one is (perhaps unsurprisingly) made to feel increasingly like an object upon which things are ridden, written, etc. Constantly being attached to an oxygen tank by my “clear plastic leash” and having PICC lines and ports taped to my skin, one feels a little more like a landscape than a body. Doctors, nurses, loved ones all make their presence known on the field of my own body, and there’s this dangerous passivity that sets in.  Of course, a landscape isn’t passive, but we often perceive it that way when it suits our actions, at our peril. Tracks on the land, tracks on the body–they are markers of more than mere presence; they are markers also of harm.

2. Health/illness as narrative vs. health/illness as lyric

In an early version of my PhD dissertation I wrestled with this topic quite a bit.  It is my contention that illness, or at least chronic illness, isn’t really a narrative. Rather it is a collection of durations, of endurances. I tried to make an argument that chronic illness brings us closer to Bergson’s ideal temporality of the duree, in that it forced a subject to encounter bodily experience, bodily time, in advance of logical or rational language.  I’m not sure that’s right, but I do think the idea of that helps me point to the reason why I find lyric such a productive mode to express what one might consider the “queer” temporality of chronic and traumatic illness.  Lyric opens the possibility for an exploded language, one that can ignore the chronological and the narrative in favor of the associative and the expressive.  The poems in Harm work hard to produce a set of affective responses out of the shards of experience.  My own illness experience is characterized not by a narrative throughline but by the aporetic and the fragmentary.  Lyric, and experimental lyric forms, offer a place for these kinds of (il)logics to take center stage.

3. Uses of the sentence in prose poetry

The sentence is an exciting unit of thought for me. It provides a recognizable structure that yet manages to be flexible and fluid, to allow for strangeness and complication. Something about the sentence is soothing, it makes you feel as if your are following a path, not lost in a morass of language.  And I think that “path” allows the reader to entertain ideas, metaphors, and statements that are a little weird–that don’t necessarily make the kind of sense a sentence usually makes.  The sentence as a set of boundaries allows for the expansion of what we think we can know.

4. Breathlessness (as exuberance, as quiet, as airless)

Breathlessness is something I think about a lot because of its dual citizenship in the realm of the medical and the highly romantic. There are so many phrases that indicate passion, surprise, love, etc that revolve around the idea of losing one’s breath (ie “took my breath away” “left me breathless” etc) and I wanted my poems to connect those two worlds togethe–as they were, in a strange way, connected for me. Many of the poems in Harm are addressed to a beloved–sometimes that beloved is my husband, sometimes my illlness. As I literally lost my breath, I attended to my heart, I suppose.

Jessica Laser from Thermos #7

Tourism

 

As a dimensional channel waves in digression

Each one heaving its own filmed liberty

The past now secluded as the sky is over

He’s thinking the privacy his own thoughts

 

I mean that from a city window life

So that mercy as which ties and appeases

Can in society that’s collective regret

Drown a man in future water

 

Only would you drag your own body

Certainly this is not the last question

Time’s bell: does the sea want to cast the land

When God pushed Cain he felt the toll

 

Knowing emphasis as grasp

The most competent sleep with meter

He had to lie with Mary save the world

So to go under this is to behold

 

Her circle’s the ambulance taking him away

The dwarf left for Zarathustra

Don’t wait says the postman

When I was also in the world as I entered it

About as simmering as they come: Adam Fell, I AM NOT A PIONEER

Exuberance and nostalgia. Punk rock. Is friendship political? Boredom, bodies, vision. Four interview prompts for Adam Fell. Inspired by his first book of poems, I Am Not A Pioneer (H_NGM_N Books, 2011). Preceded by a poem from the book. Second interview (here is the first such interview, with Robert Fernandez) that acknowledges do we sometimes read interviews to see how people get away from the questions and say whatever they want, which is what we want, too? This detective I know gets a confession, not by asking about the crime, but by mentioning [whatever]. Adam Fell’s first book confesses a “carload of sparrows” and “a field of black telephones ringing.” Is there a word for the opposite of nostalgia? Sure there is. He asks below. ZS

 

There Must Be Something Left of the Minotaur in Me

 

The children load me into the trailer,

padlock the tailgate, take the dirt road,

past the sanitation plant, the tannery,

the strip club where my friend

watched his student dance.

I put my arms through the grates,

feel dry wind, feel chaff and silt.

There is the long fence, there is the far complex.

I see the first fields maw, bristle-mouthed

wide with the wrecklings of cornstalks and soy.

I see the long, scuffed lines

of my friends being lead into buildings

by men with glowing sticks.

The workers greet the children,

unload me, laugh at their prodding,

at the glitch they make of my muscle beneath skin.

They tend me toward the line, toward

the funneling fence, the doorway.

I can hear the lowing of my friends around me.

I can hear the faint-dull puff of the bolt gun

at the temples of my friends already inside.

I can hear the collapsing, the skidding

of hooves on the draingrate, the hum

of the tangling machine lifting them to be slit.

I am nearing the doorway.

I am nearing the doorway.

A gray cloud catches in the sky

and our bronchia unrest, the men and mine,

and my friends ignore us.

The cloud stills, stalls the dry light,

brings the blunted shadow.

The men notice this.

They scuffle to look up at the sun,

bearable enough for their eyes to gather

into guarded piles for an instant.

I smell their eyes catch

like living motes in the light.

A uterine second of distrust.

This is the moment I needed.

I am not a pioneer,

I am just scared to my animal blood

of the doorway, of the men,

of what they will keep of me

and what will be grist.

I take my first step

and cannot untake it.

I gore my way through the men,

feel their stomachs give,

feel the razorwire,

the chainlink buckle before me.

I run.

The children scream near the trailer.

I run.

The gravel milling my hooves,

adding me quietly

to the dust by the teaspoon.

 

from I Am Not A Pioneer

 

1. Exuberance and nostalgia

 

I constantly learn interesting and enlightening things from my students, who tend to be eighteen, nineteen, twenty year olds, but one of the best, that came up in the context of discussing Black Swan Green, the torrentially funny, sweet, morally-complex novel, written by David Mitchell, is that when we look back and feel nostalgic, we’re mostly looking back at the world through the eyes and brains and hearts of ourselves when we were adolescents or toddlers. We remember this free, careening, colorful, waterslide of a time because we had no real grasp on the enormity and complexity of the human world, we had no real grasp on the moral grey matter of it all. I think that’s why older people can look back at the 1950’s and 1960’s and say how lovely and freeing and simple “the times” were. Or my students can look back at, say, 2004, and say how yippeeeee everything was. It’s because we cannot even begin to fathom as children how much of an emotional hurricane the present is for adults, we lack the ability to empathize with adults in any real way. Fortunately, for a good number of us, that changes though, our imaginations are never dumbed down enough so that we can’t imagine what it’s like to be someone else, or remembering what certain experiences in the past felt like.

There is nothing wrong with remembrance or yearning—god knows those are inside me too—but when remembrance and yearning are stranded and unable to push into future, when self-reflection is denounced and progressing is denounced and learning is denounced in favor of looking backwards, I get scared for the world. I think a lot of the poems in I AM NOT A PIONEER try to argue against nostalgia, argue against exuberance. There’s a poem in PIONEER, called “Makeshift Memorial” where the narrator actively lets the high school kids keep drinking shit rum and beer out by the frozen lake, despite the real, larger world swooping down on them fast. They don’t need to be finger-waged or It’s gonna get better’d. We all learn about the realities of the American experience soon enough, and then the really hard decisions need to get made.

That said, I’m wondering: Is there a word for the opposite of nostalgia? Not the disdaining of the past, but the looking forward to when you’re elderly, looking into the future and seeing simple times and joy? Sometimes, I imagine myself as I hope I am as an old man and I hope to god I’m a curmudgeon that knowingly winks at his curmudgeonliness, who swears into the air at Thanksgiving dinner, whose children pat his hand and say “Dad!” in exasperation with how untethered he is from polite social mores and niceties. I want to be the old man that looks angry as he todders out of his sliding glass doors to joyfully throw the errant whiffleball back over the fence to the neighbor kids.

Oh, those will be the days, my dears, those will be the days.

As far as exuberance goes, it just scares the hell out of me, because isn’t exuberance always a delusion? Or always a disguise? I feel like it’s those faces I trust the least, those smiling masks, those are the faces I’m waiting to unhinge their jaws.

 

2. Punk rock

 

I was a late bloomer to punk. In high school in the mid-late 90’s, I was a grunge kid. And, in fact, I’ve lately found my way back into In Utero and Nevermind again without any sense of nostalgia, just in undisguised awe of the emotionality and honesty it seems has seeped into these songs. Especially, In Utero, which is one of my favorite albums ever, and one I didn’t really like all that much when I first convinced my mom to buy it for me at Target the week it came out (I had to convince her “Rape Me” was not actually about rape, which was, in a way, a lie, and Mom, I apologize here.). I could talk all day about how powerful “Serve the Servants” and “Scentless Apprentice” are to me today, not to mention how poppy-field on fire “All Apologies” always has been.

And speaking of the old days: I actually just found, over Thanksgiving, my old poetry journals from high school and they’re filled with Smashing Pumpkins lyrics and Stone Temple Pilots lyrics. My brother, Tyler, who is four years my junior, has this hilarious, mis-memory about a poem I wrote in high school called “Mayonnaise” and he used to make fun of that title to his friends, and it has, literally, taken me 15 years to convince him he just saw a print-out of the Smashing Pumpkins song, and that I would have never, even as a kid, named a poem “Mayonnaise.” I hate mayonnaise. Both the condiment and the sound of the word.

It wasn’t until college that I really discovered punk music, but even once the light turned on I’ve always clamored more toward post-punk than actual punk. I’d much rather listen to Wire, Mission of Burma, Joy Division, Gang of Four. Those bands, taking ferocity and politics and emotional unhinging and fusing them with industrial drive, just fits my emotional core more. I’m always a bit too physically controlled of a person to get all bubble-gummy or get all dancey or thrashing, but emotionally, I’m about as simmering as they come.

The big musical influence on my poems in college was always Radiohead. though. I used to try to copy Thom Yorke’s lyrics from OK Computer and Kid A. The disjointedness yet complete emotional cohesion of them, these little four or five line powerhouses of contemporary confusion and imbalance. I strived for that but found my own strive, a little more narrative, a little less global implication, a little less co-option of  jingoism, to my more political poems, a little more snow than rain. I AM NOT A PIONEER, I hope, is political on a more personal level, considering we are all political animals and the choices we make inherently effect members of the communities we are a part of.

 

3. Is friendship political?

 

No. Not real friendship, real love, real family. They, as I’ve experienced them, operate in opposition to what I consider the tenants of American politics. No matter what political figure you support, you are being lied to. You just choose the leader who’s lies seem to fit best with your ideal version of society. I realize that that sounds infinitely cynical, but I think the key difference is that politicians know it’s all a game, they know that I bluff here, they cave there, I misquote you in an ad, you bring up my infidelity. And we, as American people, desperately need our politics to not be a game. Our very well-being means too much to be treated as pissing contest, a beauty pageant, a get-quick-rich scheme. I realize that some of these people are good and some of them want to make changes, want to better the station of everyone else, but once they get into the American political system, they find nothing but red tape, frustration, and bludgeonings from all sides.

(And that’s not even to say anything about the people with real power, the people really in charge, the executive boards of major corporations, the CEOs, the bankers.)

In my world, friendship has nothing to do with advertising, or putting on best faces. It’s about being one’s self and finding people who accept you and love you, despite your flaws, despite the fact that you may act like an asshole some times. The best thing that a friend can do is call you on your bullshit. And the best thing you can do is listen to your friends who call you on your bullshit. Then you hug, have a drink. That doesn’t happen in politics, though I wish it did. It’s constant trickery, advertising, soundbites, dumbing-down important issues, dumbing-down real people in the process, making them vote against their best interest.

Our politics is pretty much the exact opposite of how most people work and live through their days in this country. We all work with, live with, and love people who disagree with us politically and it works out just fine the vast majority of the time.

 

4. Boredom, bodies, vision

 

It’s not boredom that scares me, it’s distraction. Boredom creates a yearning for throwing one’s self out into the world, or building something emotionally inside of one’s self. Boredom tends me to access that strange, creative place   that the technological world, the rushing setting in my brain that considers our world so mundane, is so crushing to. I mean, how seldom are we truly bored any more? How often do we let Boredom take over and direct us to do something drastic and interesting about it? If we feel the slightest sliver of boredom, we go online, we spend time with The Internet, it’s hands all over us, it’s shouting and cooing and spreading and offering. We spill into the wi-fi, not the other way around. Boredom makes makes me begin a project, write, wonder, wander. Boredom and restlessness are so so often my best friends. Distraction terrifies me.

The other thing that terrifies me, and informs much of I AM NOT A PIONEER is my warm, living, terrible body, and the warm, living, terrible bodies of others. If friendship is not political, neither is love or lust, but we may, in our inevitable shittiness, turn political in the context of both. It’s something, like distraction, to fight back against, to throw our shoes at in protest. My girlfriend told me once that she had given up hope of finding someone that love the world and hated the world as much as she did. And that spark of hope, bless her heart, turned out to be me, I guess, and here I had a whole book written about how much I hated and loved the world, my world. You can’t really be ashamed of the world, but you can be ashamed of how human beings tend to act toward the world and toward each other.

During the years I was writing the poems that became PIONEER, I learned a lot about empathy, self-reflection, forgiveness, guilt. And I really only learned these things truly and forever because I made mistakes, had friends to call me on it. I made mistakes because of my body (I include my brain and heart in that word) and the specific sociological, philosophical, psychological experiences that helped shape it. I hope I AM NOT A PIONEER is an honest accounting of my warm body, my terrible body. It felt good getting all that bile out, all that love. It felt good discussing it out in the open and having to stand behind it as a piece of art, as an argument, as both a flailing out of fists and as a defusing of fists.

Thank you, Zach and Thermos, for the space and the thought and the prompts. It means a lot. Love, a.

Adam Fell was born and raised in Burlington, Wisconsin, and holds degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Iowa Writers’ Workshop.  He lives in Madison, Wisconsin, where he teaches at Edgewood College.

PS: SP CE & NebLib

In Lincoln I slept on the deepest couch, 2010. Jeff tore limbs from trees and positioned them in mailboxes. They were gone in the morning when we marveled at the spectral sign of the League for Human Dignity and did wheatgrass shots to prepare for our reading at sp ce, but it was OK, because Jeff was soon to be wed, and there was a lot of public sculpture/spaghetti house around. We called it circling the drain, and the clouds affirmed. See the palatial phallus where JD once lived? Wanna Vietnamese sandwich? So Kyle took me to the kind of house show I saw every weekend in Olympia and haven’t seen since, and when the police came we were unafraid because have you seen Kyle’s beard? He traded me shirts and told me I should’ve been taller. I tore shingles from the roof and reassured the comedian I had once been a roofer, so it was cool. Then it was Hitler’s intended capital. Then we offended another comedian who’d saved up his heckle retorts, and Paul had to get back to some pizzas. I met Carlin! Jeff’s best heckle was “boo,” and Kyle showed me a stage that could’ve been for peacocks in powdered wigs infiltrating the Gatorade-shaded park, and the mosquitoes weren’t bad. I read poems in this sp ce seen below [videos of readings], ate things in burritos, really loved meeting all these people making a sp ce amazingly and with more rough verve than most who speak of “community arts” typically understand, adored Justin’s hoodie, tried to help a spare change guy from the corner where dudes were messin’ him and got talked to by an undercover community op cop. The jokes I’d make here to please Jeff wouldn’t please anyone else (before I said it, he understood “spare change” as a “sp(are) c(hang)e” “joke”…). I have spent years making them, and now there is a sadness in it Jeff you will understand I am trying to capture the spirit of our lives together but in a lexicon two or three others might also sled toward? Jeff and I lived together in deep Massachusetts with a weight bench and two hundred books of puns and once made enchiladas three nights in a row with increasingly better ingredients. Last night my actual wife and I made ‘chiladas with seiten we (she) made at home and wetting our hands in some sauce spoke of Jeff Downey, and of Lincoln, Nebraska, and of the photographs of Jeff Downey, father famous for vistas and you eat the snake you kill, of which this last week’s Lincoln poets also to me now in their brilliance seem. Because we didn’t have Jeff we were short two tortillas to fill out the pan, and the latent sauce reminded us of the absence of not least his strong eye but his two tree-ruddy hands. Oh, but in Chicago this month there was Kyle and Paul! A common friend called Kyle “that soft-eyed poet.” Who is anybody right now I don’t miss. Invite us back to anywhere though not a moment too soon. ZS

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cluck1000/5232383129/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cluck1000/5257801437/

Jeff Downey Interviews Paul Clark and Kyle Crawford: NebLib Poets Part Five

Innate Nebraskan Jeff Downey, whose poems once appeared in Thermos, edited and introduced this week’s poets who’re associated with sp ce, the Lincoln, NE, gallery/reading space/beer palace. Here he’s interviewing two of them, Paul Clark and Kyle Crawford, re: poetry, destruction, community, and Georg Trakl. 

JD: The first time I met with you guys to talk about poems you were calling yourselves simply “Writers’ Group” and convening mostly in basements. That setting, its punk feel, seemed important then. (I remember vividly the reading you hosted in an unfinished basement that ended with everyone smashing old electronics into the wall.) How do you see sp ce gallery as an extension or departure from that place and time?

PC: Well, we still call writer’s group “Writer’s Group.”  The room we convene in currently is smaller and shittier than almost any of the places we have convened in regularly in the past.  Things have been destroyed in sp ce, I count a bookshelf and a laptop as casualties to the studio.  Oh ya, and a gigantic fluorescent light that I personally smashed in a drunken rampage.  As far as talking about poems goes, we still do that a lot, too.

KC: “Punk” is an interesting term to use here. I think that one could certainly look at what we were doing and consider some of the elements therein “punk,” but I don’t necessarily think we ever set out to be perceived that way. Punk insofar as DIY and a general disregard or indifference toward anyone who didn’t “get” what we were doing, or those who may have seen it as illegitimate. I do, however, think it’s important to note that no one outside of our “friends” really knew what the hell was going on in the first place. It wasn’t as if we set out to create something for any sort of recognition, we just wanted to do something outside of the academic setting. So we did. Meeting in basements and giving readings in basements was simply the result of availability of a space that wouldn’t annoy any of our roommates. It was an excuse for us to be overtly supportive of each other and drink booze and to be merry.

The initial “readings,” as I guess we’re calling them for the sake of this discussion, were house parties with poetry going on in the basement. They were thrown together sort of last minute as I recall, and Dan (whose house we were having the party at) had a really dank, shitty basement filled with junk he didn’t care about. I think he saw destruction as an added incentive for people to show up. It certainly worked. I didn’t really take part in destroying things, I think I may have thrown a record at the wall, but who wouldn’t? There was a sense of attention within those early readings, though. Most people did actually pay attention to the work being read. Everyone was drunk and slightly intrigued to understand what the hell was going on. It wasn’t stuffy. It wasn’t academic. It was fun, and people saw that and came back time after time.

sp ce came about because I thought we could do something at least as interesting as whatever else was taking place in the community artistically at that time. Part of me probably wanted some sort of validation or legitimacy for my friends and their work. Hosting readings in basements only goes so far, and only reaches so many people. I was definitely curious to see what a more public reaction would be. The readings have certainly tamed over the years, but the vibe entered a new kind of seriousness once sp ce began. At least for me. But honestly, I’m not really sure if meeting in and giving readings in sp ce legitimized what we were doing within the community. It made me feel good about what we were doing only because we were still having fun and we had a consistent venue to promote things we supported and enjoyed. It also gave us the opportunity to branch out into other art forms and establish a wider sense of community with people who were sort of on the outside looking in because they weren’t necessarily into writing poems.

JD: What have you been working on lately, individually and at sp ce gallery?

PC: At sp ce I recently moved the purple couch.  Justin described the new layout as “ZEN AS FUCK.”  I’ve also been sweeping the floor more when I’m there.  As far as things that matter go, we try to scrape together some art, some music, and some poetry every First Friday.  Credit goes completely to Justin for that, although I have lined up some readers.  We also have Writer’s Group up there twice a month, and that is going pretty well.

As for me, for a long time I rarely wrote poems with titles.  In the past year titles have become dominant.  I’m just going to list a bunch of titles I’m infatuated with: KIDNEY LUST, VAST AS FUCK, WILL YOU WRITE ABOUT THE WHEEL?, I LOVE TREES & I LOVE SCIENCE, A PEEBLE FACIFIST, YOU’LL BE DEAD IN A DAY, YOU ARE MORAL AND I LIKE THAT, I LIKE IT IN THE CRAFT WHEN SHE SAYS “WE ARE THE WEIRDOS, MISTER.”, SOMBERTOWN, FLORIST OF THE YEAR, FERROZARA, EYE SOCKET, I WISH I HAD A MONTH, DO YOU WORK FOR THE C.I.A.?

KC: I moved to Boise, Idaho for graduate school in August of 2010. I gave my key to sp ce to Justin or Paul and headed West with the hope they would continue working toward whatever they wanted to work toward. I am fully supportive of what they’re doing, and think they’re staying as true as they can to whatever it is they believe in at this point. I don’t really have much, if any, input on what goes on in sp ce these days, but I definitely miss having the opportunity to be a part of something with my best friends.

As I said, I moved to Boise to start my MFA in poetry in August of 2010. Since moving here, I’ve been working on poems poems poems (surprise!). At this point I’m trying to establish some sort of poetic identity for the poems themselves. I get the sense that my poems are very closed off to the world in relation to their available access for a reader. We’ll call them closed shells. I’ve really started identifying myself more and more with poets who operated in this mode. Georg Trakl specifically. Rainer Maria Rilke said of Trakl,

“In the meantime I have received ‘Sebastian in a Dream’ and have dipped into it a lot: deeply moved, marveling, divining and perplexed; for one quickly understands that the conditions of this swelling and fading of music were irretrievably singular, like the circumstances from which a dream might arise. I can imagine that even someone close to him experiences these commanding views and insights as if pressed to panes of glass, as one excluded:  for Trakl’s experience moves as if in mirror images and fills his entire world, which no one can set foot in, like the space in a mirror. (Who can he have been?)”

Intriguing for sure, but I also find this mode to be somewhat frustrating and limiting. I recently read an essay by Robert Duncan called, “The Self in Postmodern Poetry,” where he articulates his process in a way that I would, humbly, try to describe my own:

“I work with what is the matter with this life in an alchemical operation seeking not the overthrow of the matter–though increasingly the theme of letting it all go comes into the works–but the transvaluation of that matter. I read and write, gathering darkness, I would say, deepening the rift. Here, this matter of self must be seen not as undergoing change–the word itself is in question. But I work only in question; mine is a questionable work.”

Establishing an identity for a poem has been very difficult for me at this point. I’m trying to experiment with different approaches, reading poets who I haven’t necessarily identified with as much, Mayakovsky, for instance, writes poems very differently than I do. Along with Trakl, his work is very important to me at this point in my life. Separating myself or my Self from the poem’s Self has been a struggle, and I would assume will always be one for me. I think it’s important for poets to remember Duncan’s position where he said, “The poem, not the poet, seeks to be immortal and must go deep enough into its mortality to come to that edge.”

Justin Fyfe: Lincoln Ne Pts Pt 4


Justin voltas

Warmly rounding out our Lincoln feature is sp ce co-founder and poet Justin Fyfe. From Schuyler, Nebraska, Justin is a free espouser of the body and its couches. His blog WHISKY IS FOR FRIENDS (at justinryanfyfe.blogspot.com/) is the most enduringly updated blog RSS can feed. Stay soon for an interview with Paul Clark and Kyle Crawford. 

 

black hole

controls out of my factor
pen and paper haves
my wrists are horse knees too
i love you times infinity
clay nipples for the shaping
the way you mountain over pacific
and ocean
and i wish my legs were arms
and i cant see you with my hands
pinching at sex like a chore
my sweeping or hiding everything under a bed
where gods cannot see
a lead mattress with stains from a body
from when the roof leaked or the cat died
or when i swam into you etc.

 

poem thing

i’m struggling to understand my own existence
in the poem, where there is no poem

a wall there, pressing my face against it
to feel the cold move from metal into skin,

teeth become magnetized to what should be said
in the poem, where there is no poem

and questions are just words i don’t understand
because my mouth parts won’t stop talking–

things fall from things thinging, and scared me
in the poem, where there is no poem

then lightning, then thunder
wind, wind, and the storm forming

thoughts on the night when there is no storm
in the poem, where there is no poem

Kyle Crawford: Lincoln Nebraska Poets Part Three

A poem by Kyle Crawford, co-founder of sp ce gallery and third poet in our Lincoln series. One (forthcoming) interview with Kyle bios all.

Kyle introduces himself

 

glass

 

In a word, yes. Although here it wasn’t.

The village square met in the middle there

where all eyes were its focus—a steeple

rising above the tree’s shadows, above

the bells sounding hymns for time keeping,

keeping courage for tomorrow’s waking,

tomorrows ago remembered and todays

days away.

 

This was before the water rose. Before

the chunks of rock were heaved upon the

water’s way.

 

A single boat directed me, then.

 

Directions weren’t actual directions, there, where

my east wasn’t east as west wasn’t your west, too.

Despair isn’t ever despair without itself there,

and it wasn’t. Because rain makes want makes

us listen to its coming on or stirring about. It

considered us lucky, then, to live without it, or to

live with our made rain as we did or do or are

doing or have done now for days or days and days.

 

Still, it stood. Not a symbol but a steeple. All glass

but not glass, a steeple.

 

And then came the sacrifice. A village a village of

saturation for better days to come. To build higher.

To build stronger and higher than. A bubble of glass

swallowed it all up and up. The steeple not sad but

sinking. Not so much sinking but rising with

the water, then. Now look down to it, now look

down. Its glass is still glass but a broken steeple’s

just that same broken steeple.

 

Village ghosts are the lucky last ones lucky. Sing it with

them,

            Words aren’t glass but are. A boat is a boat and is.

Rachael Wolfe: Lincoln Nebraska Poets Part Two


Rachael listens

We continue our series of Lincoln poets with two poems by Rachael Wolfe. After four years of studying gender and creative writing, Rachael graduated from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Afterwards she snagged a job with State government, and is currently plotting escape to a poem commune of Amanda Huckins’ creation.

 

He is mine and I am caught

 

in a stew pot.

 

You pull out a glass and think

mother. You pull on a dress.        It’s been cut

too low. You only

think you could wear it                   To the movies. Around

the house.

 

It’s beautiful the way

we are dumb to each other.

 

It’s this and it’s then.

 

Where the rabbit got under

the fence.

 

You like vowels like they’re organs like they’re worth money.

 

 

Christmas

 

Here’s your body liquid here’s

your money. Drink a little water

or spit it back up

in the plastic. We are

we are animals. It’s something

to laugh at.

 

Here’s a little piece of fat

put it in your mouth. And thank

the television Thank

the entire department. Six

turkeys fit

inside two aluminum trays.

 

You didn’t make it fast

you didn’t leave it.



Paul Clark: Lincoln Nebraska Poets Part One

Son of a judge

Continuing our place-specific, hale younger poets series, over the next week we’ll be featuring four poets from Lincoln, Nebraska. These poets are part of a group of writers, most graduates of the University of Nebraska, known towardly as Writer’s Group. They are all associated in one way or another with the sp ce gallery in downtown Lincoln. Paul Clark is our first feature. He grew up in McCook, NE and is co-founder of the sp ce gallery. The poet Greg Kuzma, serving as a reverence, once told a potential landlord that Paul has “the most acute sense of justice” of any writer he has ever known. He lives in Omaha and has more to say about the sun at paulhansonclark.blogspot.com.

 

untitled

 

what if we couldn’t swim to glaciery glaciers.

there are parks for not seeing what you are.

 

it’s irrigation.  it’s fancy.  it’s such a obvious

extension of thirst.  firstwise: why enter

 

into an agreement with the sun if the sun is

gradually becoming 10% more luminous every 1 billion years.

 

why tell a story about those who committed

& were not more.  & sand isn’t more.  sand isn’t glass.

 

glass isn’t stained.  it’s raining.  there’s a TV on.

& none of those things will always be true.

 

i don’t think that joke “you don’t count” is funny, really.

but really, i know.

 

i could chew chewing gum for years,

& i could blow bubbles,

 

& you could watch the bubbles,

& you could pop the bubbles,

 

& you could wear the bubbles,

& the bubbles could be a life for us,

 

& a life made out of chewing gum bubbles is a life,

until it isn’t.

 

“Really, you’re very special to cry when things get broken,

to cry when you have broken things.”

 

that’s a line.

the next line is about everything breaking.

 

1. breathing through bronze is impossible.

2. i hate you & declarative statements.

 

3. heard on the radio: “they were plundered

by the plunderers who plundered them.”

 

4. a stranger sent this message on Facebook: “I’m handing it over to you.  Keep up the cause.  Thank you for your kind comments.”

 

5. this is where the poem really begins,

think of everything else as a conceptual title.

 

6. the level of alcohol

directly correlates to the frequency of thoughts re: ‘obtaining a rope.’

 

7. i don’t look like a cantaloupe,

but i feel like cantaloupe.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.